Prof. Dr. Ralf Otte is Professor of Industrial Automation and Artificial Intelligence at Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Germany. With over 30 years of experience and more than 100 AI projects worldwide, he previously held senior leadership roles at ABB and served as CEO of tecData AG and Senior Executive at Buhler Group in Switzerland. His research focuses on technical consciousness in machines, Quantum Artificial Intelligence, and Small Data AI. He has published widely and authored several influential books, including AI for Dummies and Machine Consciousness. Prof. Otte is also a frequent commentator on AI topics in German national media.

Can robots have consciousness ? What does mathematical science say about this?                               Although AI has currently triggered global hype, its applications are subject to narrow limits, which are often ignored today. AI is ideal for mathematical and big data environments, but it has massive difficulties in practical applications in natural environments, as can be clearly seen in the obstacles facing mobile robotics and autonomous driving in the natural environment. In particular, inductive AI has serious difficulties with all applications in the extrapolation space and in the area of small data. Humans, on the other hand, can make the right decisions with just a few data sets (sometimes a single hot stove is enough for a child). Human brains and current AI systems are fundamentally different. Particularly serious is the complexity limit that cannot be overcome by any current AI, which is represented by second-order predicate logic. No AI system in the world today can systematically exceed this limit, while even children have no problems with it. AI should therefore evolve from algorithmic AI to dedicated neuromorphic AI. The lecture will show how. Ultimately, the lecture presents mathematical possibilities for describing qualia and consciousness and outlines hypotheses on how consciousness could be generated on technical systems (machine consciousness). The theory presented thus bridges the gap between natural science and Japanese Shintoism, as Shintoism not only appears to have evidence, but can also be strictly mathematically justified